Protein language models (PLMs) are often assumed to capture evolutionary information by training on large protein sequence datasets. Yet it remains unclear whether PLMs can reason about evolution--that is, infer evolutionary relationships between sequences. We test this capability by evaluating whether standard PLM usage, frozen or fine-tuned embeddings with distance-based comparison, supports evolutionary reasoning. Existing PLMs consistently fail to recover phylogenetic structure, despite strong performance on sequence-level tasks such as masked-token and contact prediction. We present PHYLA, a hybrid state-space and transformer model that jointly processes multiple sequences and is trained using a tree-based objective across 3,000 phylogenies spanning diverse protein families.

Applying kernel methods to matchings is challenging due to their discrete, non-Euclidean nature. In this paper, we develop a principled framework for constructing geometric kernels that respect the natural geometry of the space of matchings. To this end, we first provide a complete characterization of stationary kernels, i.e. kernels that respect the inherent symmetries of this space. Because the class of stationary kernels is too broad, we specifically focus on the heat and Matérn kernel families, adding an appropriate inductive bias of smoothness to stationarity. While these families successfully extend widely popular Euclidean kernels to matchings, evaluating them naively incurs a prohibitive super-exponential computational cost. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce and analyze a novel, sub-exponential algorithm leveraging zonal polynomials for efficient kernel evaluation. Finally, motivated by the known bijective correspondence between matchings and phylogenetic trees-a crucial data modality in biology-we explore whether our framework can be seamlessly transferred to the space of trees, establishing novel negative results and identifying a significant open problem.

Machine learning models--including prominent zero-shot models--are often trained on datasets whose labels are only a small proportion of a larger label space. Such spaces are commonly equipped with a metric that relates the labels via distances between them.

For example, one can simply use the splits of the edges on phylogenetic trees, and assign parameters for each split inSr. Let π be a permutation ofS and Sc, that isπ(S) is a rearrangement ofS and π(Sc) is a rearrangementofSc.

Positive selection drives the emergence of adaptive mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, shaping drug resistance, transmissibility, and virulence. Phylogenetic trees capture evolutionary relationships among isolates and provide a natural framework for detecting such adaptive signals. We present a phylogeny-guided graph attention network (GAT) approach, introducing a method for converting SNP-annotated phylogenetic trees into graph structures suitable for neural network analysis. Using 500 M. tuberculosis isolates from four major lineages and 249 single-nucleotide variants (84 resistance-associated and 165 neutral) across 61 drug-resistance genes, we constructed graphs where nodes represented isolates and edges reflected phylogenetic distances. Edges between isolates separated by more than seven internal nodes were pruned to emphasise local evolutionary structure. Node features encoded SNP presence or absence, and the GAT architecture included two attention layers, a residual connection, global attention pooling, and a multilayer perceptron classifier. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.88 on a held-out test set and, when applied to 146 WHO-classified "uncertain" variants, identified 41 candidates with convergent emergence across multiple lineages, consistent with adaptive evolution. This work demonstrates the feasibility of transforming phylogenies into GNN-compatible structures and highlights attention-based models as effective tools for detecting positive selection, aiding genomic surveillance and variant prioritisation.

Phylogenetic trees elucidate evolutionary relationships among species, but phylogenetic inference remains challenging due to the complexity of combining continuous (branch lengths) and discrete parameters (tree topology).